Should there be a national database of EVERYONE’S DNA and fingerprints from birth?
Answer in the Comments below!
Ms C
Related
22 Comments
Vicente
on October 9, 2015 at 4:48 pm
I am in the middle position.My point yes is because if you do some thing
wrong the police can find you, but my point no is that if someone hacks the police website they can make bad things in your name,like saying that you did something but you actually didn’t do it.
Vicente Bianchi Ferran – 7W2P
Yes because if they were a criminal and the police had lots of trouble trying to find him /her they could check the finger print and track him down from nkayiya Osborne -miller
Great to meet you in my online laboratory too. I’ll drop you an email tomorrow regarding homework submissions but don’t worry. You’re all up to date. Enjoy your holiday!
Miss you didn’t send to me any email. Miss you know the holidays are finished and I don’t have a long time to do my homework. Miss your lesson started on Tuesday .so please send me an email ?.
Miss if someone do a crime or something like that.
The police need his DNA to know who is the person who makes the crime. So all the time the police or anyone need the DMA. To know who is the person do that thing.
Sofian
7w1s.
kcritchley
on November 6, 2015 at 9:51 am
Hello Sofian,
I’m sorry for not replying. I was on holiday in Spain! Besides, you’d already done it!
Miss C
izu
on October 28, 2015 at 7:40 pm
yes because if that person commits a crime they could track that person and they can identify suspects that were there.
Thanks for that, Izu. what if people use fingerprints to track us even if we haven’t committed a crime. Also, please add a capital letter to that sentence.
I think that it does matter beacuse some one could take your finger print or your information or somethink like that or they could hack the police website and find your page of information and copy it to there own
Sorry for doing it late i was bussy have a good day
I think yes because if there was a crime and they had 2 finger prints they would know what one is which because they dont want to catch the wrong criminal sorry for this being so late because my computer would not let me onto the site sorry
I believe they should have our finger prints but not our DNA because they could do any thing with
your DNA. Also they should have our finger prints so when there’s a murder they cant blame you
if you don’t have anything to di with it
Thanks for visiting my online laboratory
I hope you’ll be able to use my Edutronic Teacher Site as a handy way to grab/ submit your home learning, catch up missed work using my uploaded resources or even contact me for extra learning opportunities.
Guests welcome! Take a look around.
I am in the middle position.My point yes is because if you do some thing
wrong the police can find you, but my point no is that if someone hacks the police website they can make bad things in your name,like saying that you did something but you actually didn’t do it.
Vicente Bianchi Ferran – 7W2P
That’s an awesome balanced argument. If you HAD TO decide. Which side would you be on and why?
yes because if you commit a crime it will be easier for the police to find the right criminal that commited the offence
Thanks for that, Reuben. What if your fingerprints were found at a crime scene? Wouldn’t you be worried they might think it was you?
P.S. I’d like you to add a capital letter to that sentence!
Yes because if they were a criminal and the police had lots of trouble trying to find him /her they could check the finger print and track him down from nkayiya Osborne -miller
But what about all the fingerprints we leave behind when we don’t commit crimes? What might happen to the falsely accused?
This homework is now closed!
Please submit to you NEW science teacher.
Hi ? miss I’m your new student Sofian Ermak
Hello Sofian!
Great to meet you in my online laboratory too. I’ll drop you an email tomorrow regarding homework submissions but don’t worry. You’re all up to date. Enjoy your holiday!
Miss you didn’t send to me any email. Miss you know the holidays are finished and I don’t have a long time to do my homework. Miss your lesson started on Tuesday .so please send me an email ?.
Miss if someone do a crime or something like that.
The police need his DNA to know who is the person who makes the crime. So all the time the police or anyone need the DMA. To know who is the person do that thing.
Sofian
7w1s.
Hello Sofian,
I’m sorry for not replying. I was on holiday in Spain! Besides, you’d already done it!
Miss C
yes because if that person commits a crime they could track that person and they can identify suspects that were there.
Thanks for that, Izu. what if people use fingerprints to track us even if we haven’t committed a crime. Also, please add a capital letter to that sentence.
Sorry miss Critchley for not doing on time
I think they should track everyone to see what they are doing and also to keep an eye on us.
I think that it does matter beacuse some one could take your finger print or your information or somethink like that or they could hack the police website and find your page of information and copy it to there own
Sorry for doing it late i was bussy have a good day
I think yes because if there was a crime and they had 2 finger prints they would know what one is which because they dont want to catch the wrong criminal sorry for this being so late because my computer would not let me onto the site sorry
Oh that’s all right. It wasn’t late!
Is there any reason you might NOT want to have your fingerprints on file?
Ms C
I believe they should have our finger prints but not our DNA because they could do any thing with
your DNA. Also they should have our finger prints so when there’s a murder they cant blame you
if you don’t have anything to di with it
Nice. Do correct the sentence structure here even though it’s not the real HL piece. Show me capitals and full stops.